Page 135 - Costellazioni 6
P. 135

GÜNTER RADDEN, Meaningful Grammar



                                 Sentence (1b) demonstrates an even more radical impact of the
                           caused-motion construction. Here, the caused-motion construction ap-
                           plies to an intransitive verb. The verb sneeze normally denotes a pro-
                           cess that only involves one argument, the sneezing person. In the
                           caused-motion construction, however, it has three arguments, and the
                           meaning  imposed  by  the  construction  can  be  described  as  ‘one’s
                           sneezing causes a thing to move to a place’. An interesting side effect
                           is that can be used with one or three arguments, but not as a transitive
                           verb with two arguments, i.e. we can’t say *Fred sneezed the tissue.
                                 These examples clearly show that grammatical constructions
                           have meaning of their own independently of the lexical items used in
                           them. When, as in these sentences, the meanings conveyed by the
                           lexical words and the grammatical construction are in conflict, gram-
                           mar normally wins out and coerces an interpretation that is in line
                           with its grammatical construction.


                           1.2 Grammatical structure is motivated
                           Most words are arbitrary, i.e. there is no motivated connection between
                           the form of a word and its meaning. Grammatical constructions, on the
                           other hand, are to a large part motivated. A convincing example of moti-
                           vation in language is iconicity, i.e. the conceived similarity between a form
                           of a sign and its meaning. Consider the following instances of word order:
                           the order of the clauses in (2a) and the order of the adjectives in (2b):

                                 (2a) Silvia had a baby and got married.
                                 (2b) It is a cute little Italian boy.


                           The order of the coordinated clauses in (2a) reflects the order in which
                           the two events occurred: Silvia first had a baby and then got married,
                           possibly as a result of having a baby. If we reversed the order of the
                           clauses, i.e. as Silvia got married and had a baby, its meaning would
                           change, too: Silvia first got married and then had a baby. both interpre-
                           tations are due to the iconic principle of temporal order. The sequential
                           order in which coordinated sentences are presented is thus meaning-
                           ful—it is, in fact, so self-evident that we don’t give it any thought.
                                 Let us now consider the order of the attributive adjectives in (2b).
                           The order of the three adjectives sounds natural and cannot really be



                                                           133
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140