Page 134 - Costellazioni 6
P. 134

GÜNTER RADDEN, Meaningful Grammar


                           1. By way of introduction


                           We all agree that the function of language is to communicate meaning.
                           As aptly phrased by Roman Jakobson, one of the pioneers of twentieth
                           century linguistics, «language without meaning is meaningless». but
                           which part of language is meaningful? We mostly think of words as
                           the meaningful units of language. We are much less likely to associate
                           grammar with meaning. This paper is meant to show that grammar is
                           meaningful as well — and rebut the widely held belief that grammar
                           is no more than a set of formal rules. Let us consider three aspects of
                           grammar that demonstrate its meaningfulness.


                           1.1 Grammatical structure is meaningful
                           Like lexical items, grammatical units are symbolic as a pairing of form
                           and meaning. It can easily be shown that grammatical constructions are
                           meaningful. Let us consider the so-called caused-motion construction,
                           as in Fred threw the letter into the wastebasket. The predicate (throw) of the
                           sentence has three arguments: a subject (Fred), a direct object (the letter),
                           and a directional adjunct (into the wastebasket). The meaning of this sen-
                           tence can be paraphrased as ‘Fred caused the letter to move into the waste-
                           basket’ — hence the term caused-motion construction. In her construc-
                           tion-grammar approach, Adele Goldberg (1995: 152-179) demonstrated
                           that the caused-motion construction is also used with verbs that do not
                           normally take three arguments, as illustrated in the sentences under (1).

                                 (1a) Fred kicked the dog into the bathroom.
                                 (1b) Fred sneezed the tissue off the table.


                           In sentence (1a), the verb kick is used in the caused-motion construc-
                           tion. Kick is a transitive verb that normally only takes two arguments,
                           as in Sam kicked the ball. An act of kicking affects an object, but it does
                           not bring about any change: The ball does not burst or fly away. Kick
                           is thus normally not used in a causative sense and simply means ‘hit
                           something with one’s foot’. In sentence (1a), however, the number of
                           arguments of kick is increased by a third argument: into the bathroom.
                           The meaning of kick has also changed, too: It now means ‘one’s hitting
                           with one’s foot causes a thing to move to a place’.



                                                           132
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139