Page 158 - Costellazioni 5
P. 158

DANIEL T. LOCHMAN, Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene


                Queene not only as encountering disruptions but also as retaining and
                remembering networks of more-or-less similar but non-contingent
                and discontinuous embodied narrative experiences — experiences that
                draw on what Caracciolo calls “memories of bodily movement (expe-
                riential traces) as part of the process of co-constructing fictional
                                      14
                worlds” in narratives. The salience of such networked, embodied
                memories results in part from textual cues that can prompt a range of
                responses and act as literary affordances. These may be noetic (that
                                                        15
                is, related to an intentional process of consciousness), subliminally af-
                fective, or both at once. Intratextual memories form networks prompt-
                ed within a work like the Faerie Queene, while intertextual memories
                may be prompted across texts. Cues derived from other works, such
                as, for example, Orlando Furioso, may reappear in the Faerie Queene not
                just as allusions but as related textual experiences, more or less similar
                and resonant as a unified complex of thought, feeling, and kinetic re-
                sponse, and they may signal a collective, distributed cultural memory
                that may be embedded within a text.
                     Narratives that generate textual memories produce what Moni-
                ka Fludernick and Caracciolo have called “experientiality,” wherein
                a text mimetically evokes an active, embodied response that may be
                expressed in a variety of cognitive and affective registers. A reader
                may recall series of responses in texts that produce memorial experi-
                ences, and these, if articulated, can be shared enactively with others,
                creating a discourse of distributed and extended textual remember-
                   16
                ing. Of course, autobiographical memories of each reader, the range
                and types of prior reading, and specific contexts of a reading yield dif-






                14  Caracciolo, The Experientiality of Narrative, 160.
                15  On affordances in relation to reading and cognition, see Terence Cave,
                Thinking with Literature: Towards a Cognitive Criticism (Oxford: Oxford Uni-
                versity Press, 2016), 42-62.
                16  See Giovanna Colombe i, The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enac-
                tive Mind (Cambridge, Massachuse s: MIT Press, 2014), especially 190-201,
                and Monika Fludernik, “Collective Minds in Fact and Fiction: Intermental
                Thought and Group Consciousness in Early Modern Narrative,” Poetics Today
                35, no. 4 (Winter 2014): 690-730.


                                                157
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163